So what did we learn from this year\u2019s annual Sebring 12-Hour? The answer is not much that we already didn\u2019t know. At Sebring both the slower 2011 prototypes and their 2010 spec predecessors, now hobbled by the rules so they don\u2019t outshine the lesser performing 2011 models were present. And, in looking at the results, if the outcome of the venerable Central Florida affair suggested anything, it was that perhaps, at least at this stage, it might have been better if newer cars had been left home.<\/span><\/p>\n And, for those who might need further convincing that the new generation prototypes are ready. there is the fact that the fourth home 2010 bred Audi turbo diesel R15+ had spent more than a little time in the paddock. It was being repaired from its tangle with the second Factory 908 (which eventually struggled across the line in eighth) and lapped as quickly as 2011-spec 908 in front of it, once it returned to the track.<\/span><\/p>\n Now, if all of this <\/span>doesn\u2019t<\/span> send the ACO boys reaching for the headache powder, perhaps the second place performance of the gasoline powered <\/span>Highcroft<\/span> Racing ARX-01e will.<\/span><\/p>\n Delivered to Highcroft less than a week before the start, with its paint figuratively still soft to the touch, it ran like a freight train, fighting for the lead for much of the way. Maybe, the ACO will solve the Highcroft Acura issue by simply not inviting it to come over this June; although, given the current Japanese disaster, that might seem like hitting someone when they\u2019re flat on their back. (One never needs bad press, you know.)<\/span><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.doubledeclutch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/ILMC-11-Sebring-55061.jpg\" "\\"ILMC-11-Sebring-5506\\"")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n